1. When a product is given at no cost to
the "reviewer" that is a "freebie," which many people like to get only for the purpose
of getting a free product. They may have no real use for it, but it is free,
and so why knock that?
2. A
person receiving a free product can
get egotistical for having being "honored" and given a free product.
This often leads to "feel good" reviews and insipid criticisms, if any.
3. Reviewers of freebie products may do a
conscientious job of using, analyzing and reviewing the product. But as they
received it at no cost, and did not pay any money out of their pockets for it, the
cost of the product is very rarely considered in terms of "valuing"
the product. Most consumers do take the actual out-of-pocket cost into
consideration, but freebie reviewers very rarely do.
4. Freebie reviewers are very conscious of
and want to continue receiving free products. The great majority of such
reviewers believe that a product should be given a 5-stars review so as to
continuing to receive free products from Amazon sellers. Very few reviews of
these freebies are given less than 5 stars. We have actually seen Amazon
comments between two Vine Reviewers who had given 3 stars to a product, that
they were receiving negative opinions about their non-5-stars reviews and that
this may result in their not receiving further freebies to review.
5. Many
reviewers actually have no
personal use for the product that they receive. It is often passed on to
someone else, and a 5-stars review written which is superficial and
third-party based.
Some products are never used in a real-life situation, but false claims
are
made based on "testing" in a non-user environment. For example, for a
freebie bedwetting alarm, a
review states:
"This
is a wonderful idea. Heavy
sleepers can be awakened to get to the bathroom, hopefully, in time to
avoid an accident. I did test it, three times with a moist cloth, as directed,
and all three times the alarm went off." If this reviewer really examined the facts about this alarm, or compared it in detail with many others as has been provided in great detail on Wired Alarms the reviewer would realize that in order to make the alarm small [good] the manufacturer must use small batteries that
(a) possess very little power capacity (about 360 mAH compared to the approximately 2400 mAH for a typical pair of AAA alkaline batteries as used in most alarms) [bad],
(b) are unable to generate much sound or vibration [bad],
(c) are exhausted (die) very soon and need frequent replacement [bad].
(a) possess very little power capacity (about 360 mAH compared to the approximately 2400 mAH for a typical pair of AAA alkaline batteries as used in most alarms) [bad],
(b) are unable to generate much sound or vibration [bad],
(c) are exhausted (die) very soon and need frequent replacement [bad].
If
this reviewer really was a "heavy sleeper" as stated above, the 76.5
dB of maximum sound level produced by this alarm at a typical distance of 8
inches from the ear, and the very slight vibration, especially as felt through the padding of the armband, probably would not even make the user twitch! Plus not
actually using this alarm gave the reviewer no information of its ease of use, reliability,
convenience, battery exhaustion, etc. But a 5 stars review was given to this freebie.
Many actual users have pointed out deficiencies in this product in their
reviews, and favorable facts as well. IF the reviewer was only considering the psychological effect of a bedwetting alarm on the user (patient) then this alarm might prove just as effective as a $20 alarm or a $200 alarm!
Here is another recent example from a freebie reviewer:
Here is another recent example from a freebie reviewer:
"I gave this to someone I know who
has a toddler and asked for their opinion ... Tested on the husband and it
works but haven't had an alarms go off on the child yet (only used for a few
days now)." Huh? "Gave it to someone I know?!" "Toddler?!" "Tested on the husband?!" "Haven't had an alarm go off on the child yet...?!" And this gets 5-stars from a person who is not even concerned about third-party reviewing! This "reviewer" seems to be completely overwhelmed by the gratuity of receiving the alarm as a freebie, and looking at all of this reviewer's Amazon reviews, certainly has been receiving many gratuities and hopes to receive many more! 82 reviews by this "reviewer", none as an Amazon Verified Purchaser, with 74 5-stars and 8 4-stars. Incredible and unbelievable!
We
have therefore made it our policy to disregard reviews given in return for
receiving a freebie.
We
have
also found that sellers, usually with uninteresting products and/or
products with deficiencies, desperate to hype their poor products, are
the
sellers usually providing freebies so as to hype and increase their
Amazon
reviews ratings. We are concerned that Amazon has created and is
promoting this opportunity to get easy (and possibly unmerited) reviews.
In our opinion, Amazon's hap-hazardous review policies are creating
substantial potential for abuse and manipulation by desperate sellers,
and the misinformation of Amazon buyers.
Two
such products on Amazon recently came to our attention.
1. BEDWETTING ALARM Nocturnal Enuresis Bed
Wetting Alarm Treatment sold on Amazon by Dry-Knight, and
2. Lil' Juml Bedwetting Enuresis Alarm
sold on Amazon by Lil' Jumbl .
Perhaps they learned their lesson from Chummie, the undoubted King of Hype!
Perhaps they learned their lesson from Chummie, the undoubted King of Hype!
Wired Alarms on the site Urine Alarms .
No comments:
Post a Comment