http://drybuddy-enuresis-solutions-bad.blogspot.com
http://drybuddy-enuresis-solutions-review.blogspot.com
http://drybuddy-enuresis-solutions-risk.blogspot.com
http://drybuddy-bedwetting-alarm-terrible.blogspot.com
http://drybuddy-bedwetting-alarm-risk.blogspot.com
Chummie is displaying great enthusiasm in their deceit by having six repetitive blogs.
Another blog of Chummie’s at http://drybuddy-bedwetting-alarm-testimonial.blogspot.com/
is now empty, and may have
been emptied and cancelled by Google for harassment or other punishable acts.
So don’t be surprised if the other sites mentioned above, or parts of them start
getting deleted or altered. However, we have copies of every one of these blogs
posted by Chummie and/or its associates, and can make them available whenever
needed.http://drybuddy-enuresis-solutions-risk.blogspot.com
http://drybuddy-bedwetting-alarm-terrible.blogspot.com
http://drybuddy-bedwetting-alarm-risk.blogspot.com
Chummie is displaying great enthusiasm in their deceit by having six repetitive blogs.
Another blog of Chummie’s at http://drybuddy-bedwetting-alarm-testimonial.blogspot.com/
We must admit that we have now seen an unbelievably new and high level of duplicity, deceit, and fraud being perpetuated by Chummie. Several new and repetitive blogs have come to our attention. These blogs are supposedly owned by "DryBuddy Enuresis Solutions", and “DryByddy Enuresis Solutions”, which contain very extensive attacks and lies about DryBuddy and its owning company. They are outstanding examples of the lengths to which Chummie will go in its deceit and vindictiveness.
It did not take much of an effort to conclude that the true owner/author of these blogs is Chummie or some associate of Chummie's. The style, the content, and the unmitigated lies (more on that later) were certainly in line with what we have identified extensively about Chummie. Without doubt, there is no other party in the bedwetting alarm industry who has achieved the ignominy or notoriety that Chummie has achieved with blatantly false statements and accusations. As suggested earlier, the culture of deceit appears to be well entrenched and thriving at Chummie. This example certainly establishes that even further. We shall also point out Chummie's pettiness in attempting to attack DryBuddy possibly because of the facts that we posted about Chummie's deceitfulness.
Let us start with the name of the owner/author of the blog which is blatantly and brazenly anti DryBuddy. Why would DryBuddy, or the company owning it, put their name to a blog which is nothing less than a soap box from which the perpetrator openly hurls lies and absurdly false accusations against DryBuddy? They would not.
Although many of the statements and claims in this blog were obviously ridiculous and false, we wanted to confirm some matters with DryBuddy and contacted them about these matters.
In the opening statement, Chummie claims that "wireless products that radiate dangerous levels of energy near your child's genitals, Drybuddy is a dangerour product." We shall again ignore the typos and misspellings which are typical of Chummie's poor command of the English language, particularly when Chummie is riled. We made inquiries of three persons knowledgeable about the wireless radiation from a DryBuddy sensor-like device, and asked if it would be "dangerous" for a child, or anyone else. In every instance the question was met with laughter, with the suggestion that with all of the car and other remote devices being used, radiation dangers would be very well known and acknowledged by far more believable and credible parties than Chummie. Also, how is it that Chummie is not criticizing the DRI Eclipse, which also transmits radio waves from "near your child's genitals." And this DRI device has been in service much longer than DryBuddy's. More indulgence by Chummie in selective invention that suits Chummie at the moment?
Chummie was also ridiculed for their complete lack of even basic electrical knowledge as it would be impossible from a device using a small 3 volts button battery from even having the capacity to "radiate dangerous levels of energy." Even more so a device that was designed to be using this small battery power source for a long period of time. But then, no-one ever said that Chummie had any technological know-how!
We asked this last question to a spokesperson for the company that owns DryBuddy. Although there was some initial laughter, it was followed by our being informed that an internet posting against DryBuddy in December, 2012 made the very same accusation, and was falsely posted in the name of the owner of the Bedwettingstore. This is a competing party that also sells bedwetting alarms. When the owners of DryBuddy and the Bedwettingstore discussed this, the Bedwettingstore owner not only vowed that he had never posted such a claim, but also pointed out that the email address used was not his email address. The two companies concluded, for a variety of reasons, that this false posting probably came from Chummie, trying to stir up bad feelings among competitors of Chummie. Now when this false issue is raised in this hopelessly bogus blog, the people at DryBuddy conclude that this blog and posting are coming directly or indirectly from Chummie. And we must concur. The repetition is too far out and absurd except to have come from the same party who's thoughts and imagination flow along constant lines of fault and absurdness.
Note:
Chummie(TM) has a very large number of entries about its deceit in this blog. There are so many more entries and much more serious bad activities attributable to Chummie, so that Chummie has significantly more entries than all other manufacturers combined. You can read all of the Chummie deceit entries on this blog.
Chummie has also been given a 0-stars blog of its own so that its many examples of deceit can stand out by themselves. This Chummie blog is at
http://chummiedeceitcatcher.blogspot.com/ .
Grand Deceit.
We shall continue the exposé of this blog in Chummie: Grand Deceit -- Part 2.
No comments:
Post a Comment