Friday, October 4, 2013

Chummie & Theos Medical Systems – Analysis and Deceit in Advertising.

Thanks to some information we obtained recently from the internet, we have to re-evaluate our estimates on Theos Medical Systems’ Chummie bedwetting alarm and their degree of deceit.

Quick Summary:


In our opinion there is a 95% probability that Chummie’s North American sales are between 500 and 1,500 units per year. We would associate a 99% probability that their current annual sales in North America are between 400 and 2,500 units. Our expectation would be about 1,200 units per year.

The key is Chummie’s success, or the lack of it, on eBay. eBay is without question the second largest and most important site for selling products such as Chummie, after Amazon. Chummie has been sold on eBay since July 30, 2011, which is about when they entered the U.S. and North American market. Since that time, eBay reports that 107 units of Chummie have sold as of October 4, 2013.
We obviously have to make some estimates of eBay’s share of the market relative to Amazon, and tertiary sites such as Rakuten, Sears, Wayfair, etc. which are also used by Chummie to offer their wares to the public.

Amazon:

 

We would estimate that Chummie’s sales on Amazon could be as much as 5 times greater than on eBay. The primary reason for giving Amazon this large edge over eBay is that Chummie has been stuffing positive reviews on Amazon, something that they cannot do successfully on eBay. We note that many reviews on Amazon come from sources with very limited exposure to Amazon, and there are almost no Amazon “REAL NAME” reviewers, particularly for positive reviews. We also believe that a very substantial number of reviews probably originate directly with Chummie (its principals, relatives, employees, etc.) with several “Amazon Verified Purchase” being Chummie or its friends purchasing the product from Amazon, and Chummie taking the hit for Amazon’s fee with the expectation that these “Verified Purchase” reviews would provide more credibility. That is what one would expect, but with the likely abuse of this by Chummie, we cannot place much credibility on these reviews.
We also pay attention to when, and under what circumstances, reviews occur on the Chummie page on Amazon, and the content of such reviews. We notice that whenever Chummie receives a negative review, a rash of positive reviews promptly appear. Many completely toe Chummie’s line, even when it is irrational or just plain stupid in our minds for a person to be behaving or claiming what is often read. Many reviews are “testimonials” to buy more items from Chummie, although this defeats Chummie’s avowed purpose of reducing the cost to the customer. Also, to get around obvious defects in Chummie, such as the sensor not staying on the briefs, many customers come up with alternatives including using duct tape and putting on a second set of briefs to help the sensor to remain in place.
Here is a recent review in its entirety:
My child moves around alot when he sleeps and the alarm gets triggered for any little thing. The batteries die extremely quick. It works but a good portion of the time it goes off randomly even at the slightest movement. The alrm itself is pretty uncomfortable for my son since its bulky and he sleeps stomach down but anything to help him stop wetting the bed and being self concious.”
This got an understandable comment of “Why are you still using It?” Our guess for the obvious answer would be “I have wasted over $100 on this, because of all the false advertising that I read. I cannot just throw away this money. With my experience I would never have purchased it.”
Everything is looking even phonier than when we did our analysis in July on Chummie’s Amazon Reviews. For phony Chummie positive reviews on Amazon, we now place a 90% confidence level at between 25% and 50% of positive Chummie reviews being fakes placed by Chummie, with an expectation of about 35% to 40% fake positive reviews. Chummie has also been extremely aggressive in having negative reviews removed from Amazon, for many of which we do not understand why it happened. As an example, please see Amazon-Chummie 
In essence, Chummie’s credibility for its reviews on Amazon is being revised negatively for Chummie. From a “stars” perspective, if Chummie was not fiddling substantially with its Amazon reviews, we doubt if Chummie would get more than 3-stars.

Other Selling Sites:


These sites include Best Buy, Sears, Wayfair, Rakuten, etc. that advertise the Chummie product. It is interesting to note that the first and most prominent site (particularly in Chummie’s advertising and claims), Best Buy, now stipulates “We’re sorry, this item is no longer available.” Best Buy was Chummie’s claim to selling in a major retail store on two continents. Best Buy has obviously dropped Chummie as not being a suitable product for them to carry. Chummie, however, has not dropped Best Buy from its site and advertising. But then Chummie has never displayed a sufficient level of truth or honesty in its advertising to be given even reasonable credit.
If Best Buy considered Chummie to be a dud, how long will these tertiary sites keep Chummie? Maybe forever, as they are simply listing sites that get a commission from Chummie if anything is sold. They do not have to stand behind or support or give refunds for any poor product sold on their site, which apparently became a severe burden for Best Buy. But sales through these channels should be very low.

Chummie’s Web Site:


Chummie can expect some sales from its own store. However, please note that Chummie does not subscribe to any paid advertising (for example, Google Adwords) and is not on the first two pages of a Google search for “bedwetting alarm” which may be the most commonly used phrase for an organic search. Consequently, sales on its site would be less than it might be with paid advertising and better organic ranking.

Negative Press:


Chummie has many reviews relating to them on the internet. Some are positive, but it is our opinion that almost all (and probably all) are either written and placed by Chummie or placed by parties who receive some form of compensation from Chummie. See chummie-very-strong-deceit-on-internet  for more details.

Furthermore, on unbiased comprehensive comparison sites which present detailed raw data about all of the alarms sold in the U.S. Chummie compares very poorly with several competing devices, both for features and price. See comparebedwettingalarms/wired-alarms as an example.

Foreign Sales:


Although Chummie claims to sell its product in other countries, we have no reason to believe that they may be more successful in these countries compared to North America. We also believe that the North American market is by far the largest market in the word. We shall ignore Chummie’s sales abroad and focus on North American sales.

Conclusion:


In our opinion there is a 95% probability that Chummie’s North American sales are between 500 and 1,700 units per year. We would associate a 99% probability that their current annual sales in North America are between 400 and 2,500 units. Our expectation would be about 1,200 units per year.

The probability of Chummie having sold over 100,000 units two years ago, or have over 100,000 satisfied  families today (according to Chummie’s advertising) tends to zero. In other words, we think it extremely safe to state that these sales numbers of Chummie are ridiculously improbable and fictitious.

Looking at this blog, it is apparent that there are severe problems with Theos Medical Systems and their Chummie product, and the manner in which they conduct their business. These apparent problems only get worse with time and more exposure to their behavior. With the low apparent volume of their sales and the unethical manner in which they promote their sales, their sustainability as a viable business becomes more and more questionable.

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Is someone at Amazon too chummy with Chummie?


The following emails were sent about September 1, 2013.


Dear Sirs,

We are the author(s) of a blog, which has performed substantial analysis of Deceit on the Internet. Our blog site is http://bedwettingalarmsdeceitcatcher.blogspot.com/ and you will see that we are performing a significant service to the public as well as sites like yours by pointing out where and how deceit is occurring on the internet with respect to the bedwetting alarm industry.

Our “About Me” for the site reads:
Deceit is the quality that prompts intentional concealment or perversion of truth for the purpose of misleading. There is considerable deceit in the bedwetting alarm industry. The purpose of this blog is to point out the bogus (fake, phony) claims and deceptions of manufacturers and sellers and try to improve the ethics and business practices of this industry through exposure. Note: All products mentioned are trademarked and/or the property of their owners.
This entry specifically addresses a 1-star review on Amazon in October 2012 by ballboy 99, who gives a 1-star review to a product sold on Amazon with ASIN: B00A8GF6BO or the equivalent at that time.

Ballboy 99 asks “NOTE: This is the second post of this alarm review. For some reason Amazon deleted my first one. Is this seller able to get negative reviews removed?? Isn't that a conflict of interest?”

In our opinion ballboy 99’s review was a perfectly legitimate review which Theos Medical Systems (the owner of the Chummie product) got removed at least twice for reasons that we certainly do not understand.

A few weeks after ballboy 99 re-instated his review, it disappeared again.

This is of great concern to us as well, as it indicates substantial deceit on the part of the Chummie product’s owner on Amazon as well.

Reading our blog http://bedwettingalarmsdeceitcatcher.blogspot.com/ will show that Chummie gets more deceitful blog entries than ALL other manufacturers put together. They are without question, the most deceitful company on the internet in this industry. We would strongly recommend that you read this blog, where every entry is backed up with actual data. You will note that the relationship between Chummie and Amazon has been brought into question.

As observers of this matter for many months, we personally agree with ballboy 99’s statement that his negative review was removed for reasons that he does not understand. We are also aware that for AT LEAST the past one year, many negative reviews of the Chummie product have been removed. As one rather simple example, we can personally attest that Chummie had 207 reviews on Amazon on Wednesday, August 21, 2013. By Friday or Saturday, a few days later, the total reviews were down to 203. We believe that at least 4 (four) negative reviews were removed. We are reasonably assuming that they were removed at Chummies instigation. Why is this happening so frequently with Chummie, compared to all other parties in this category at Amazon that we are aware of? This obviously allows Chummie to have much more positive ratings and reviews on Amazon than they may truly deserve. We certainly would like to know, and receive a proper and complete answer from Amazon about these happenings.
This high number of removals of negative Chummie reviews on Amazon can be caused by
1.       Almost all negative reviews of Chummie are false or fake or not in line with Amazon guidelines, which we cannot believe or agree with (the ballboy 99 review is an excellent example),
2.       As suggested by ballboy 99, and possibly others, does Chummie have a special relationship with Amazon? We doubt that this would be so in the open. And
3.       Does Chummie have some special relationship with someone within Amazon who will perform these favors for Chummie? Is someone at Amazon colluding with Chummie? We are not suggesting that Amazon (the company) is colluding with Chummie. But it is certainly possible that someone inside Amazon may be involved. We understand that Amazon’s support team for such activities is based in India, as are Chummie’s owners. Corruption is part of everyday life in India, as can be read in numerous reputable and reliable sources, and involves even large corporations like Walmart. Although we cannot say that someone in Amazon’s group is colluding with Chummie, it certainly is a possibility that merits a thorough investigation by Amazon.

We raise these matters as it is in Amazon’s best interests to keep its house clean and not behave in a partial manner towards any seller. Our site also very adequately demonstrates that Chummie is exceptionally deceitful. Its attacks on competitors are well known, and some of Chummie’s most fraudulent attacks and inventions are also pointed out in the blog.

Please provide us with an answer about Chummie’s disappearing negative reviews, and also what steps Amazon might take to prevent such transgressions by Chummie in the future. We would appreciate any insights that you can provide. Like Amazon, we too are attempting to reduce or eliminate deceit on the internet. Amazon’s assistance and possible actions if any irregularities are discovered would be appreciated and welcomed.

It is in everyone’s best interests to be aware of what we are stating here. We shall post this letter on our blog about September 15, 2013. We hope that this will give you adequate time to give a positive and comprehensive reply, which we would also like to post for the information of the internet community of which Amazon is a very important part. If, for some reason, you wish us to delay the posting(s), please let us know.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Deceit Catcher

Friday, August 9, 2013

Chummie: Very Strong Deceit – Fraud on Amazon – Getting Amazon to Remove Negative Reviews.

We have reported earlier on Chummie’s Very Strong Deceit on Internet Review Sites, particularly Amazon. We have also raised the issue elsewhere in the blog wondering how Chummie had reduced (have deleted) many of the negative ratings they had received from legitimate Amazon customers. We particularly remember one long and detailed breakdown off all of the issues which this customer was having with the Chummie alarm. We recall seeing it, then it disappeared, then it was placed back in by the customer. In recent months it has not been on Amazon. We really do not understand why Amazon should have kowtowed to Chummie and removed a very honest, accurate, relevant, non-abusive review which said that the Chummie was a 1-star product, and explained why.

[for Chummie and its chums, whose knowledge of English is sparse:
kowtow - Definition [kou-tou, -tou, koh-]
(v.) To act in a servile manner
Source: Dictionary.com             ]

 Here is the review:

 Customer Review
3 of 6 people found the following review helpful


1.0 out of 5 starsProduct does not work. Buyer Beware., October 11, 2012
                [This is a 1-star review, where the star is not reproducing on this blog site-Author]
Product does not work. Buyer Beware., October 11, 2012
By 
ballboy 99

Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)

This review is from: Chummie Premium Bedwetting Alarm Blue. Over 100,000 alarms sold worldwide - Better Technology for Faster Treatment (Health and Beauty)

NOTE: This is the second post of this alarm review. For some reason Amazon deleted my first one. Is this seller able to get negative reviews removed?? Isn't that a conflict of interest?

I bought this alarm after reading the glowing customer reviews. I don't usually leave reviews, but had to make sure parents hear an honest account of why you should NOT purchase the Chummie. Wearing the alarm box on the neck is VERY uncomfortable and the sensor is a joke. Our son wet the bed about every night and often more than once a night. He was a very sound sleeper like most children with bedwetting. We bought the Chummie and it was a big mistake.

First, the clip on the alarm unit. It is designed so that the alarm unit pokes your child in the neck if they wear it like it is designed. Look at the picture of the alarm unit on the child. If you wear a top with a regular neck opening think about where the alarm is going to sit - poking your child in the neck. Would you want to sleep all night with a hard plastic box poking you in the neck. As of this writing, they don't show you the back of the alarm unit. It is a small plastic piece that you have to hook on to your child's neck opening. The clearance is really small. You really can't lift it up and open it up enough so that it is really hard to hook up at night. If the cloth of the pajamas is thick, good luck in trying to getting it to work. This is an issue. It is really uncomfortable and my son hated it. Our son is average build and the clothing he wears has standard neck openings. Most people probably end up putting the alarm in the bed which really bothers me because of the strangulation hazard that this causes.

Random Electrical Problems - We experienced numerous problems with the sounding of the alarm. Some times the alarm would just go off in the middle of the night for no reason. Other times the alarm would not stop sounding unless we removed the batteries. After so many problems we found that if we removed the batteries each night before bed, then reinserted them that the alarm would usually work that night. If you are experiencing the same problem, this is probably a solution.

Sensor cord - pulls out of the alarm unit frequently. The sensor that you put on the underwear is connected to the alarm unit with an electronic plug. It just pushes in and doesn't lock in place. Sometimes our son would wake up wet and we would find that the sensor plug had come undone. Why doesn't this thing lock in place. Frequent false alarms. Poorly designed.

Sensor - the sensor is a big disappointment. The marketing team made it sound good, but they needed a couple of parents with kids for testing. Sure, they made a sensor but no way to secure it to underwear. So what do they do? Give you a pack of Chummie bandages to tape the sensor to underwear. Let's get real. This is the 21st century. The adhesive is so poor and the bandages are so small they don't work. Do you really want to be using band aids every night trying to make the sensor stick to your kid's underwear? What if your child wets twice a night. It's 2 am and you are in your child's room trying to get the sensor to stick on with tape?

 Harsh? No, just honest feedback. We have used an alarm in the past that was much superior to this "advanced" unit. I fell for the hype. Maybe you won't. When the Chummie includes cheap band aids to make their alarm work take it as a sign! Don't waste your money
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No
[Add comment]

Comments

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Oct 22, 2012 1:04:00 AM PDT
The reason amazon removes these reviews is because we know it is the Bedwetting Store who is posting these reviews.
We have been able to link these accounts and purchases to you.
You are badmouthing the Chummie when you should be promoting your alarm which has reached its "end of life".
Chummie is the ONLY alarm which works.
We have revolutionized the bedwetting alarm with our modern patented technology which has helped over 100,000 children globally.
Parents have a choice. Buy Chummie or buy an outdated alarm.
In their best interest, they make the right decision and purchase the Chummie.
Permalink | Report abuse
2 of 7 people think this post adds to the discussion. Do you?
 Yes No



In reply to an earlier post on Oct 22, 2012 1:21:35 PM PDT
Theos says that "Chummie is the ONLY alarm which works." Capitalized ONLY. Everybody would be interested in knowing how you come to this amazing conclusion! Give us some good, valid, reliable substantiation! The next two sentences are also on the exceptional exaggeration list of Theos, as there is again no substantiation. And the last sentence, is undoubtedly part of a GIANT wish list that is the the only thing visible to Theos, so that they cannot even conceive anything else! Wow!
2 of 3 people think this post adds to the discussion. Do you?  Yes No
Ballboy 99, you did a great service to people who are still being hammered by Chummie’s deceit. Your review and concern about Amazon’s attitude towards it are justified, as it has disappeared again. But it is resurrected here as a service to all people who want to know about Chummie and its deceitful methods. This is a great example!

Also note Chummie/Theos’s response. It certainly ranks very high on the list of most conceited, fake and goofy responses that we have seen. Truly Perceptive says what this entire blog has being saying about Chummie. Chummie and Theos are as fake as a $3 bill!

As has been historically true, Chummie probably will not respond to this review of yours. But we can always hope that Amazon will, if it is brought to their attention. We, and other readers of this blog, would certainly like to know about this review and why it disappeared from Amazon.


Note:

Chummie(TM) has a very large number of entries about its deceit in this blog. There are so many more entries and much more serious bad activities attributable to Chummie, so that Chummie has significantly more entries than all other manufacturers combined. You can read all of the Chummie deceit entries on this blog.

Chummie has also been given a 0-stars blog of its own so that its many examples of deceit can stand out by themselves. This Chummie blog is at
http://chummiedeceitcatcher.blogspot.com/ .


Chummie: Very Strong Deceit – Fraud on Amazon – Getting Amazon to Remove Negative Reviews.

Chummie: Desperation Deceit – No Defense – Only Loud Barking!

As we have been pointing out for over two months and covering well over twenty blog entries, Chummie has the very unique distinction of being by far the most deceitful party in the bedwetting alarm industry.

Many details of deceit by Chummie have been meticulously explained in this blog. If Chummie was an honest and non-deceitful party, they should have explicitly explained their position with respect to each and every allegation and piece of evidence, so as to attempt a legitimate defense.

It appears that Chummie has NO legitimate defense. No explanations to explain why the allegations are not true have been forthcoming. Chummie’s reaction has been typically Chummie: Send the attack dogs to bark as loudly as they can. This is also very consistent with deceit by perversion.

Chummie made extremely false accusations against DryBuddy and its parent company Enuresis Solutions, LLC, which were refuted in depth. One false accusation in which Chummie was mis-representing itself as the FDA and threatening Enuresis Solutions was even passed over to the FDA for their investigation and action. Chummie’s response to even this was to quietly delete these blog entries, but to no avail as copies were in the FDA’s (and our) possession.

We currently doubt that Chummie will ever attempt to refute the facts against it, as they are all true facts. Chummie would look and sound just as foolish attempting to refute them as they now do with all of their falseness exposed. Chummie’s barking defense is as empty as Chummie’s value system, containing little if any of honor, ethics, morals, or credibility! But they will keep on barking as this is the substance of their present character.

Even though the only legitimate and ethical approach would be to revoke and re-constitute themselves into an ethical entity, this would take unusual courage and ethical fortitude. We can always hope that Chummie will turn over to a new and good page.


Note:

Chummie(TM) has a very large number of entries about its deceit in this blog. There are so many more entries and much more serious bad activities attributable to Chummie, so that Chummie has significantly more entries than all other manufacturers combined. You can read all of the Chummie deceit entries on this blog.

Chummie has also been given a 0-stars blog of its own so that its many examples of deceit can stand out by themselves. This Chummie blog is at
http://chummiedeceitcatcher.blogspot.com/ .


Chummie: Desperation Deceit – No Defense – Only Loud Barking!

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Chummie: Desperation Deceit


Chummie (and, of course, Theos Medical Systems) keeps extending its levels of deceit to ever higher levels. Not having the capacity or mental acuity to do anything original other than indulge in deceit, Chummie is now trying to imitate this site.

Chummie may never realize that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Unfortunately for them, they are so impaired that they are incapable of doing even a modest job of imitation, limiting their imitation to the use of the words "Bedwetting Alarm(s) Deceit." Beyond this, their postings are typically Chummie, with crude gesticulations, unoriginal ideas and the banalities that Chummie is known for.

As of the moment, we have noticed the following posts in Google search that can be attributed to Chummie:


www.pissedconsumer.com/...bedwetting-alarm/nytone-bedwetting-alarm...
Jul 31, 2013 - The Nytone Bedwetting Alarm is a Bedwetting Deceit by Perversion and Concealment. This is a truly horrible one of a kind Deceit in Totality.

 

·  Nytone Bedwetting Alarm: Deceit by Perversion and Concealment.

www.pissedconsumer.com/...bedwetting-alarm/nytone-bedwetting-alarm...
Jul 26, 2013 - I got ripped off by the Nytone Medical. The Nytone Bedwetting Alarm that they sent me was smelling of vomit. I spoke with someone in their ...

drybuddy-bedwetting-alarm-terrible.blogspot.com/.../waste-of-money.ht...
Jul 22, 2013 - Enuresis Solutions LLC has deployed full-scale lies, deception and deceit for promoting the DryBuddy Bedwetting Alarm. The lies are much ...

drybuddybedwettingalarm.weebly.com/
DryBuddy Bedwetting Alarm uses deceitful tactics to sell wireless products that radiate dangerous levels of energy near your child's genitals. Create a free ...

www.companynamesucks.com/malem-bedwetting-alarm---bedwetting-st...
Jul 26, 2013 - Malem Bedwetting Alarm - Bedwetting Store Sucks review posted on ... products sold by Bedewettingstore.com are Deceit by Concealment.

www.abc4.com/...Bedwetting-Alarm/him5rHX6qUS5C0BBV7pRFQ.csp...
Jun 20, 2013 - Nytone Bedwetting Alarm. Sydney Weaver from Nytone shows a new ... Deceit by Perversion and Concealment. This product is high on deceit.

www.ripoffreport.com/.../Nytone-Medical-Nytone-Bedwetting-Alarm-is-...
1 day ago - Nytone Medical Complaint Review: Nytone Medical Nytone Bedwetting Alarm is a High on Deceit, Buyers Beware. Savannah Georgia.

We are not expert enough to say whether stupidity is a genetic trait, a learned (or unlearned) trait, or something else. But we must give Chummie a high grade for repeating obviously absurd inventions. These have generally been laid to rest, but Chummie and/or Chummies' flacks do not yet sense that with their very limited powers of creativity and thought.

So the story keeps unfolding, with Chummie providing new dimensions of craziness as they vent their spleen at Nytone, DryBuddy and Bedwettingstore. Why these? The answer can only be found in Chummie's weird mind.

This entire thing is becoming more and more entangling for Chummie. Does anyone want to help them move along faster? Perhaps they can tie themselves up so thoroughly in their own obfuscation, that they won't be able to save themselves from themselves. Remember the FDA fiasco?  See

Cheers, everyone!


Note:

Chummie(TM) has a very large number of entries about its deceit in this blog. There are so many more entries and much more serious bad activities attributable to Chummie, so that Chummie has significantly more entries than all other manufacturers combined. You can read all of the Chummie deceit entries on this blog.

Chummie has also been given a 0-stars blog of its own so that its many examples of deceit can stand out by themselves. This Chummie blog is at
http://chummiedeceitcatcher.blogspot.com/ .

Chummie: Desperation Deceit

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Deceit on the Internet: Shopping Reviews -- Reducing Fake Amazon Reviews.

Fake and deceitful reviews on shopping sites is a common occurrence. Amazon.com is the largest internet shopping site, and gets a tremendous number of reviews on a tremendous number of products and services that might be sold on Amazon. Undoubtedly, many of these reviews are fake and false. Some parties may almost be in the business of promoting their product and hurting competitors' products by fake reviews posted on Amazon by themselves or their flacks (shills). We have extensively reported on one such party in this blog.
We are aware that Amazon has procedures in place to try to prevent or reduce such bogus reviews. However, there is little doubt, that a substantial number of fake reviews get by Amazon's people who examine these reviews (we shall refer to them as Examiners). We feel that much of this is because of Amazons dedication to allowing a variety of expressions and opinions to be expressed. And Amazons criteria for allowing a review on its site is loose and often subject to interpretation by its Examiners. Unfortunately, the quality of Amazon's Examiners goes all over the place, from intelligent and willing to understand the circumstances for or against a review, to people who are incapable of going beyond a very literal reading of Amazon's rules, with no other considerations allowed. These latter Examiners have a favorite phrase which is often used - "This does not violate Amazon's rules."
This blog entry is not intended to be a critique of what may be wrong with Amazon's review policies. Our objective is to reduce deceit on the internet. So let us present an opinion expressed as a comment by Helen Smith on August 4, 2013 to our blog entry "Chummie: Grand Deceit -- Fizzle and Frazzle" which we posted on this blog on August 2, 2013. Helen's comments are reproduced below:
Hi,
I am repeating a comment I posted on an earlier entry on this blog, as it is applicable anywhere a seller is trying to prevent fake reviews. My suggestion relates to fake reviews on Amazon.
What you have said in an earlier blog Chummie: Grand Deceit -- Fizzle and Frazzle is so correct. I quote
"They have been very vociferous in their proclamations, many of them based on Chummie's deceit. They have screamed at anyone who called their bluff, or pointed out their flaws, or suggested any changes in their aggressive and deceitful practices and behavior. Chummie's response was often to invent even more deceit with which to threaten persons or parties that they felt threatened by. All with the intent to continue on their road of deceit.
They are obviously after DryBuddy, which must be scaring Chummie silly with their product(s). From what I have read in your entry "Chummie: Grand Deceit -- Part 2," Chummie will be facing a major competitive problem shortly.
With Chummie's established track record of deceit and manipulating reviews on sites like Amazon, I would bet that Chummie will be flooding Amazon with fake negative reviews on any product that DryBuddy places there. Other competitors might as well.
I am an Amazon seller in a completely different area. I have also had to endure fake negative reviews from competitors. I would suggest that DryBuddy considers doing what I do.

The review must come from a buyer who is both "Amazon Verified Purchase" and also "Real Name." Using just "Amazon Verified Purchase" lets people buy an inexpensive item and provide a fake review. And for a bad-mouthing competitor like Chummie, it may be worth spending $30 to be able to lie about your product. So by itself it is not reliable. But when you add "Real Name" to it, now will have only proper reviews from people who are willing to back up their review truthfully with their name.
For people who may have purchased the item directly from you, explain that they will have to use the "Real Name" on Amazon which matches their credit card "Real Name" when they ordered from you. Else it is probably a fake review.

Using both "Amazon Verified Purchase" and also "Real Name" has worked for me. Several genuine customers have informed me that my explaining this and branding an inappropriate review as a possible fake for these reasons has been very acceptable to them. And for people who want to lie, brand them and forget them. They may bring your Amazon rank down, but there isn't much you can do about fakes and liars, unless you also want to be like Chummie and massively flood Amazon with fake positive reviews.
I hope that this helps you and every other seller and buyer on Amazon and similar sites to try and keep reviews honest. I shall post it on some of your other blogs as well, and you may post this comment as a blog entry anywhere on your deceit related sites.
I appreciate the big effort that you have put into revealing deceit in the bedwetting alarm industry. We need this in other areas as well.

Good luck, and God Bless you.
Helen's idea merits consideration. State on your Amazon placement that if a buyer wishes to offer a review on Amazon, the purchase from Amazon must be made using the buyer's "Real Name" - the name on the credit card used for the purchase at Amazon. Although it is not impossible for such a name to be false, it is very likely to be a true name. Further state that a reviewer must have a "Real Name" as well as be an "Amazon Verified Purchase" for the review to be considered valid.
If the item can be purchased directly from the seller's site, the seller should state on the site that it must be purchased using the same name as on the credit card being used on the purchase. It must then be reviewed on Amazon with the same name which Amazon would certify as being a "Real Name." The seller could verify that this is a valid purchase from his/her site, since Amazon would not have labeled it as an "Amazon Verified Purchase."
Reviews that do not meet these criteria for proof of actual and valid purchase would be branded as "FAKE."
Explain this on your site and on your Amazon placement. People who do not wish to give or use their real name can still buy from either Amazon or the Seller's site using a pseudonym. But any review on Amazon would be label FAKE. As part of this FAKE label, state why the review has been so branded, since the buyer did not follow the conditions for a purchase which would be considered to be valid for a review on Amazon. These instructions would have been posted on both Amazon's and your site.
We recognize that Helen's idea may be difficult to follow for products sold by many sellers who do not have access to all sale records. But for numerous sellers selling unique items or limited to just selling on Amazon and/or their own site, it might work.
We do not know if this would be acceptable to Amazon. And although we understand Helen's viewpoint, there is some possibility that a potential customer may take umbrage for whatever reason. But, as stated earlier, if the customer does not intend to post a review on Amazon (and most don't) then using a pseudonym is not an issue at all.
As we said earlier, this merits consideration. Your feedback is welcome. Please make your feedback productive, participative and honorable, whether you agree with the idea or not. Suggest improvements to make it more feasible. It is important to all persons, buyers, sellers and Amazon, that reviews not be fake and prejudicial.
Please remember that our objective is to reduce and try to eliminate deceit on the internet. Reducing fake and bogus reviews on Amazon would be a substantial step in that direction, an objective that only the rogues can object to - and they would not do that publicly.
Thank you.

Monday, August 5, 2013

Chummie: Deceit by Perversion -- Best Buy


Chummie: Deceit by Perversion     http://www.chummie.com/buy-bedwetting-alarm-retail-store/           (August 5, 2013)
Chummie has never been shy about announcing anything that they wanted to announce. In this instance we are talking about their “Retail Partners” about whom Chummie has said a lot. They even have a special page on their web site (see above) where they display this list of “select retailers.”
Prominently listed on this page is Best Buy. We do know that Chummie was being sold at Best Buy. But for several months, if we clicked on Chummie’s “Buy Now” at their Best Buy link, on being sent to the Best Buy site, we would get the message:
We're sorry. We didn't find any matches for "chummie " in All Categories
So, to be certain about facts, we contacted Best Buy and asked about their carrying Chummie.
We were told that Best Buy terminated their relationship with Chummie and Theos Medical Systems some time ago. We did not get an exact date. But at least two months ago based on our experience with looking for Chummie on Best Buy’s site.
It appears that Best Buy decided that they no longer wanted to have any relationship with Chummie and Theos Medical Systems. Based on our ongoing analysis of Chummie, both the product and the company’s behavior, we can imagine why.
What is also obviously deceitful is that at least two months after they were dropped by Best Buy, Chummie continues to falsely brag on its web site that Best Buy is selling their device.
These deceitful facts just keep on continuing with respect to Chummie. Two or more months after their relationship with Best Buy was terminated, Chummie does not think it necessary to remove Best Buy from their list of “select retailers?”
And, of course, we have an appropriate copy of Chummie’s web page above, so we can always prove that Chummie was falsely and deceitfully advertising this item today (August 5, 2013). Let us see how long it takes Chummie to remove Best Buy from its web site. Of course, they could leave it there as a continuing reminder to people to buy Chummie from Best Buy!
And what might Chummie do if more of their “select retailers” get wise to Chummie and drop them?


Note:

Chummie(TM) has a very large number of entries about its deceit in this blog. There are so many more entries and much more serious bad activities attributable to Chummie, so that Chummie has significantly more entries than all other manufacturers combined. You can read all of the Chummie deceit entries on this blog.

Chummie has also been given a 0-stars blog of its own so that its many examples of deceit can stand out by themselves. This Chummie blog is at
http://chummiedeceitcatcher.blogspot.com/ .

Deceit by Perversion.