Showing posts with label favors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label favors. Show all posts

Friday, October 4, 2013

Chummie & Theos Medical Systems – Analysis and Deceit in Advertising.

Thanks to some information we obtained recently from the internet, we have to re-evaluate our estimates on Theos Medical Systems’ Chummie bedwetting alarm and their degree of deceit.

Quick Summary:


In our opinion there is a 95% probability that Chummie’s North American sales are between 500 and 1,500 units per year. We would associate a 99% probability that their current annual sales in North America are between 400 and 2,500 units. Our expectation would be about 1,200 units per year.

The key is Chummie’s success, or the lack of it, on eBay. eBay is without question the second largest and most important site for selling products such as Chummie, after Amazon. Chummie has been sold on eBay since July 30, 2011, which is about when they entered the U.S. and North American market. Since that time, eBay reports that 107 units of Chummie have sold as of October 4, 2013.
We obviously have to make some estimates of eBay’s share of the market relative to Amazon, and tertiary sites such as Rakuten, Sears, Wayfair, etc. which are also used by Chummie to offer their wares to the public.

Amazon:

 

We would estimate that Chummie’s sales on Amazon could be as much as 5 times greater than on eBay. The primary reason for giving Amazon this large edge over eBay is that Chummie has been stuffing positive reviews on Amazon, something that they cannot do successfully on eBay. We note that many reviews on Amazon come from sources with very limited exposure to Amazon, and there are almost no Amazon “REAL NAME” reviewers, particularly for positive reviews. We also believe that a very substantial number of reviews probably originate directly with Chummie (its principals, relatives, employees, etc.) with several “Amazon Verified Purchase” being Chummie or its friends purchasing the product from Amazon, and Chummie taking the hit for Amazon’s fee with the expectation that these “Verified Purchase” reviews would provide more credibility. That is what one would expect, but with the likely abuse of this by Chummie, we cannot place much credibility on these reviews.
We also pay attention to when, and under what circumstances, reviews occur on the Chummie page on Amazon, and the content of such reviews. We notice that whenever Chummie receives a negative review, a rash of positive reviews promptly appear. Many completely toe Chummie’s line, even when it is irrational or just plain stupid in our minds for a person to be behaving or claiming what is often read. Many reviews are “testimonials” to buy more items from Chummie, although this defeats Chummie’s avowed purpose of reducing the cost to the customer. Also, to get around obvious defects in Chummie, such as the sensor not staying on the briefs, many customers come up with alternatives including using duct tape and putting on a second set of briefs to help the sensor to remain in place.
Here is a recent review in its entirety:
My child moves around alot when he sleeps and the alarm gets triggered for any little thing. The batteries die extremely quick. It works but a good portion of the time it goes off randomly even at the slightest movement. The alrm itself is pretty uncomfortable for my son since its bulky and he sleeps stomach down but anything to help him stop wetting the bed and being self concious.”
This got an understandable comment of “Why are you still using It?” Our guess for the obvious answer would be “I have wasted over $100 on this, because of all the false advertising that I read. I cannot just throw away this money. With my experience I would never have purchased it.”
Everything is looking even phonier than when we did our analysis in July on Chummie’s Amazon Reviews. For phony Chummie positive reviews on Amazon, we now place a 90% confidence level at between 25% and 50% of positive Chummie reviews being fakes placed by Chummie, with an expectation of about 35% to 40% fake positive reviews. Chummie has also been extremely aggressive in having negative reviews removed from Amazon, for many of which we do not understand why it happened. As an example, please see Amazon-Chummie 
In essence, Chummie’s credibility for its reviews on Amazon is being revised negatively for Chummie. From a “stars” perspective, if Chummie was not fiddling substantially with its Amazon reviews, we doubt if Chummie would get more than 3-stars.

Other Selling Sites:


These sites include Best Buy, Sears, Wayfair, Rakuten, etc. that advertise the Chummie product. It is interesting to note that the first and most prominent site (particularly in Chummie’s advertising and claims), Best Buy, now stipulates “We’re sorry, this item is no longer available.” Best Buy was Chummie’s claim to selling in a major retail store on two continents. Best Buy has obviously dropped Chummie as not being a suitable product for them to carry. Chummie, however, has not dropped Best Buy from its site and advertising. But then Chummie has never displayed a sufficient level of truth or honesty in its advertising to be given even reasonable credit.
If Best Buy considered Chummie to be a dud, how long will these tertiary sites keep Chummie? Maybe forever, as they are simply listing sites that get a commission from Chummie if anything is sold. They do not have to stand behind or support or give refunds for any poor product sold on their site, which apparently became a severe burden for Best Buy. But sales through these channels should be very low.

Chummie’s Web Site:


Chummie can expect some sales from its own store. However, please note that Chummie does not subscribe to any paid advertising (for example, Google Adwords) and is not on the first two pages of a Google search for “bedwetting alarm” which may be the most commonly used phrase for an organic search. Consequently, sales on its site would be less than it might be with paid advertising and better organic ranking.

Negative Press:


Chummie has many reviews relating to them on the internet. Some are positive, but it is our opinion that almost all (and probably all) are either written and placed by Chummie or placed by parties who receive some form of compensation from Chummie. See chummie-very-strong-deceit-on-internet  for more details.

Furthermore, on unbiased comprehensive comparison sites which present detailed raw data about all of the alarms sold in the U.S. Chummie compares very poorly with several competing devices, both for features and price. See comparebedwettingalarms/wired-alarms as an example.

Foreign Sales:


Although Chummie claims to sell its product in other countries, we have no reason to believe that they may be more successful in these countries compared to North America. We also believe that the North American market is by far the largest market in the word. We shall ignore Chummie’s sales abroad and focus on North American sales.

Conclusion:


In our opinion there is a 95% probability that Chummie’s North American sales are between 500 and 1,700 units per year. We would associate a 99% probability that their current annual sales in North America are between 400 and 2,500 units. Our expectation would be about 1,200 units per year.

The probability of Chummie having sold over 100,000 units two years ago, or have over 100,000 satisfied  families today (according to Chummie’s advertising) tends to zero. In other words, we think it extremely safe to state that these sales numbers of Chummie are ridiculously improbable and fictitious.

Looking at this blog, it is apparent that there are severe problems with Theos Medical Systems and their Chummie product, and the manner in which they conduct their business. These apparent problems only get worse with time and more exposure to their behavior. With the low apparent volume of their sales and the unethical manner in which they promote their sales, their sustainability as a viable business becomes more and more questionable.

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Is someone at Amazon too chummy with Chummie?


The following emails were sent about September 1, 2013.


Dear Sirs,

We are the author(s) of a blog, which has performed substantial analysis of Deceit on the Internet. Our blog site is http://bedwettingalarmsdeceitcatcher.blogspot.com/ and you will see that we are performing a significant service to the public as well as sites like yours by pointing out where and how deceit is occurring on the internet with respect to the bedwetting alarm industry.

Our “About Me” for the site reads:
Deceit is the quality that prompts intentional concealment or perversion of truth for the purpose of misleading. There is considerable deceit in the bedwetting alarm industry. The purpose of this blog is to point out the bogus (fake, phony) claims and deceptions of manufacturers and sellers and try to improve the ethics and business practices of this industry through exposure. Note: All products mentioned are trademarked and/or the property of their owners.
This entry specifically addresses a 1-star review on Amazon in October 2012 by ballboy 99, who gives a 1-star review to a product sold on Amazon with ASIN: B00A8GF6BO or the equivalent at that time.

Ballboy 99 asks “NOTE: This is the second post of this alarm review. For some reason Amazon deleted my first one. Is this seller able to get negative reviews removed?? Isn't that a conflict of interest?”

In our opinion ballboy 99’s review was a perfectly legitimate review which Theos Medical Systems (the owner of the Chummie product) got removed at least twice for reasons that we certainly do not understand.

A few weeks after ballboy 99 re-instated his review, it disappeared again.

This is of great concern to us as well, as it indicates substantial deceit on the part of the Chummie product’s owner on Amazon as well.

Reading our blog http://bedwettingalarmsdeceitcatcher.blogspot.com/ will show that Chummie gets more deceitful blog entries than ALL other manufacturers put together. They are without question, the most deceitful company on the internet in this industry. We would strongly recommend that you read this blog, where every entry is backed up with actual data. You will note that the relationship between Chummie and Amazon has been brought into question.

As observers of this matter for many months, we personally agree with ballboy 99’s statement that his negative review was removed for reasons that he does not understand. We are also aware that for AT LEAST the past one year, many negative reviews of the Chummie product have been removed. As one rather simple example, we can personally attest that Chummie had 207 reviews on Amazon on Wednesday, August 21, 2013. By Friday or Saturday, a few days later, the total reviews were down to 203. We believe that at least 4 (four) negative reviews were removed. We are reasonably assuming that they were removed at Chummies instigation. Why is this happening so frequently with Chummie, compared to all other parties in this category at Amazon that we are aware of? This obviously allows Chummie to have much more positive ratings and reviews on Amazon than they may truly deserve. We certainly would like to know, and receive a proper and complete answer from Amazon about these happenings.
This high number of removals of negative Chummie reviews on Amazon can be caused by
1.       Almost all negative reviews of Chummie are false or fake or not in line with Amazon guidelines, which we cannot believe or agree with (the ballboy 99 review is an excellent example),
2.       As suggested by ballboy 99, and possibly others, does Chummie have a special relationship with Amazon? We doubt that this would be so in the open. And
3.       Does Chummie have some special relationship with someone within Amazon who will perform these favors for Chummie? Is someone at Amazon colluding with Chummie? We are not suggesting that Amazon (the company) is colluding with Chummie. But it is certainly possible that someone inside Amazon may be involved. We understand that Amazon’s support team for such activities is based in India, as are Chummie’s owners. Corruption is part of everyday life in India, as can be read in numerous reputable and reliable sources, and involves even large corporations like Walmart. Although we cannot say that someone in Amazon’s group is colluding with Chummie, it certainly is a possibility that merits a thorough investigation by Amazon.

We raise these matters as it is in Amazon’s best interests to keep its house clean and not behave in a partial manner towards any seller. Our site also very adequately demonstrates that Chummie is exceptionally deceitful. Its attacks on competitors are well known, and some of Chummie’s most fraudulent attacks and inventions are also pointed out in the blog.

Please provide us with an answer about Chummie’s disappearing negative reviews, and also what steps Amazon might take to prevent such transgressions by Chummie in the future. We would appreciate any insights that you can provide. Like Amazon, we too are attempting to reduce or eliminate deceit on the internet. Amazon’s assistance and possible actions if any irregularities are discovered would be appreciated and welcomed.

It is in everyone’s best interests to be aware of what we are stating here. We shall post this letter on our blog about September 15, 2013. We hope that this will give you adequate time to give a positive and comprehensive reply, which we would also like to post for the information of the internet community of which Amazon is a very important part. If, for some reason, you wish us to delay the posting(s), please let us know.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Deceit Catcher